Vaccine Effectiveness Against the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron Variant in Solid Organ and Islet Transplant Recipients in England: A National Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) B.1.1.529 Omicron variant in immunosuppressed solid organ and islet transplant (SOT) recipients is unclear. METHODS: National registries in England were linked to identify SARS-CoV-2 positive tests, noninjury hospitalization within 14 d, and deaths within 28 d between December 7, 2020, and March 31, 2022 in adult SOT recipients. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for infection, and hospitalization or death, were adjusted for recipient demographics and calendar month for the Omicron-dominant period (December 20, 2021, to March 31, 2022). Mortality risk following SARS-CoV-2 infection was adjusted for recipient demographics and dominant variant using a Cox proportional-hazards model for the entire time period. RESULTS: During the Omicron-dominant period, infection IRRs (95% confidence intervals) were higher in those receiving 2, 3, and 4 vaccine doses than in unvaccinated patients (1.25 [1.08-1.45], 1.46 [1.28-1.67], and 1.79 [1.54-2.06], respectively). However, hospitalization or death IRRs during this period were lower in those receiving 3 or 4 vaccine doses than in unvaccinated patients (0.62 [0.45-0.86] and 0.39 [0.26-0.58], respectively). Risk-adjusted analyses for deaths after SARS-CoV-2 infection between December 7, 2020, and March 31, 2022, found hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 0.67 (0.46-0.98), 0.46 (0.30-0.69), and 0.18 (0.09-0.35) for those with 2, 3, and 4 vaccine doses, respectively, when compared with the unvaccinated group. CONCLUSIONS: In immunosuppressed SOT recipients, vaccination is associated with incremental, dose-dependent protection against hospitalization or death after SARS-CoV-2 infection, including against the Omicron variant.

A coordinated national UK liver transplant program response, prioritizing waitlist recipients with the highest need, provided excellent outcomes during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare provision has been severely affected by COVID-19, with specific challenges in organ transplantation. Here, we describe the coordinated response to, and outcomes during the first wave, across all UK liver transplant (LT) centers. METHODS: Several policy changes affecting the liver transplant processes were agreed upon. These included donor age restrictions and changes to offering. A "high-urgency" (HU) category was established, prioritizing only those with UKELD > 60, HCC reaching transplant criteria, and others likely to die within 90 days. Outcomes were compared with the same period in 2018 and 2019. RESULTS: The retrieval rate for deceased donor livers (71% vs. 54%; P < .0001) and conversion from offer to completed transplant (63% vs. 48%; P < .0001) was significantly higher. Pediatric LT activity was maintained; there was a significant reduction in adult (42%) and total (36%) LT. Almost all adult LT were super-urgent (n = 15) or HU (n = 133). We successfully prioritized those with highest illness severity with no reduction in 90-day patient (P = .89) or graft survival (P = .98). There was a small (5% compared with 3%; P = .0015) increase in deaths or removals from the waitlist, mainly amongst HU cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully prioritized LT recipients in highest need, maintaining excellent outcomes, and waitlist mortality was only marginally increased.

Real-world Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 in Solid Organ and Islet Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: The clinical effectiveness of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in immunosuppressed solid organ and islet transplant (SOT) recipients is unclear. METHODS: We linked 4 national registries to retrospectively identify laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and deaths within 28 d in England between September 1, 2020, and August 31, 2021, comparing unvaccinated adult SOT recipients and those who had received 2 doses of ChAdOx1-S or BNT162b2 vaccine. Infection incidence rate ratios were adjusted for recipient demographics and calendar month using a negative binomial regression model, with 95% confidence intervals. Case fatality rate ratios were adjusted using a Cox proportional hazards model to generate hazard ratio (95% confidence interval). RESULTS: On August 31, 2021, it was found that 3080 (7.1%) were unvaccinated, 1141 (2.6%) had 1 vaccine dose, and 39 260 (90.3%) had 2 vaccine doses. There were 4147 SARS-CoV-2 infections and 407 deaths (unadjusted case fatality rate 9.8%). The risk-adjusted infection incidence rate ratio was 1.29 (1.03-1.61), implying that vaccination was not associated with reduction in risk of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Overall, the hazard ratio for death within 28 d of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 0.80 (0.63-1.00), a 20% reduction in risk of death in vaccinated patients (P = 0.05). Two doses of ChAdOx1-S were associated with a significantly reduced risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.69; 0.52-0.92), whereas vaccination with BNT162b2 was not (0.97; 0.71-1.31). CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination of SOT recipients confers some protection against SARS-CoV-2-related mortality, but this protection is inferior to that achieved in the general population. SOT recipients require additional protective measures, including further vaccine doses, antiviral drugs, and nonpharmaceutical interventions.

Endoscopy during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic: impact on activity and financial implications for a tertiary referral center in London.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented global medical emergency. National and international gastrointestinal societies recommended that any endoscopic activity during the lockdown phase of the pandemic should be limited to emergency or non-deferrable procedures only. We assessed the financial implications and impact on endoscopy activity of the lockdown phase in a tertiary referral endoscopy unit. METHODS: The number of endoscopy procedures canceled and performed in our endoscopy unit during our "delay phase" (16-22/03/2020) and "lockdown phase" (23/03-29/05/2020) was reviewed and compared with endoscopy activity conducted during the same period in 2019. The financial impact was subsequently analyzed. RESULTS: Between 16/03/2020 and 29/05/2020, 683 procedures were canceled and 365 non-deferrable procedures were performed. In contrast, in 2019, 3437 procedures were performed over the same timeframe, resulting in a revenue contraction of approximately €2,062,857. We estimated that the number of lists required to recuperate the canceled endoscopic activity, ranges from 103-155, depending on the level of personal protective equipment required and mitigating policy relating to COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight that COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial negative impact on our endoscopy activity and on the revenue generated by our endoscopy unit.

A coordinated national response maintained a safe and effective UK liver transplant program during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic

P091 Figure 1Number of livers from UK deceased doners offered, retrieved and transplanted, 4 February 2020 to 5 April 2021[Figure omitted. See PDF]DiscussionA sophisticated national response has maintained a safe and effective UK LT program throughout the first year of COVID. We adapted our resources, implementing phased donor restrictions and a new category for recipient prioritisation. Patients benefitted from collaborative working, enabling those in most need to be transferred and transplanted in protected centres. Consequently, we mitigated against a significant fall in LT activity. Our collaborative response serves as an as exemplar for other specialist healthcare services.

P39 Real world experience of using bezafibrate for PBC

P39 Table 1 UDCA+BZF UDCA+OCA+BZF BZF Median age starting BZF 53.5 (39-72) 60 (53-68) 66.5(56-74) Median liver stiffness (Fibrosis score kPa) 8.25 (3.3-46.2) 10.5 (5.1-13.5) 12.8 (8.2-27.3) Total number of patients started on therapy 14 5 4 Co-existing liver disease 2 (14) 0 (0) 1 (25) Tried OCA for at least 12 months prior (%) 8 (57) 5 (100) 0 (0) Total number of patients with >15% reduction in ALP (%) 10 (71) 5 (100) 3 (75) Total number of patients with ALP>1xULN to ALP<1.67xULN (%) 5 (36) 4 (80) 2 (50) Total number of patients who normalised ALP (%) 2 (14) 1 (20) 1 (25) Median% reduction in ALP between months 1-3 of starting BZF 45.6(7.5-72.9) 52.9 (25.2-63.1) 27.2 (11.1-73.9) Total number of patients stopped therapy due to intolerance/side effects (%) 2 (14) 0 1 (25) Our data demonstrate that over a median of 2 months follow-up, BZF is well tolerated with only 3/23(13%) stopping therapy. BZF was effective especially used as triple therapy, as shown by at least 15% reduction in ALP in 18/23(78%) and ALP<1.67xULN in 15/23(65%) even at this very early time point. No patients died or experienced complications of hepatic decompensation.

O3 The UK paediatric liver transplant programme during the COVID-19 pandemic

IntroductionThe UK has been severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact on the adult population has been disproportionately higher when compared to children with consequent challenges to organ donation and liver transplantation (LT). Across the three UK paediatric liver centres there has only been a very small number of patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and all made a speedy and full recovery. We report here the response during the pandemic across the 3 paediatric LT centres.MethodsA series of nationally agreed policy changes affecting the liver procurement, listing and transplant process were agreed during regular meetings with LT centre directors and NHSE. Actions at a local and national level were agreed to protect and maintain the paediatric LT programmes.Data were collected from 27/03/20 until 26/11/20 and compared with same time period for the years 2016–19.ResultsDuring the study period, there was a significant reduction in the adult population in the mean number of weekly liver offers, donors and LTs compared to before the pandemic with signs of recovery between the 1st and 2nd UK lockdown periods (figure 1). More specifically the number of livers offered nationally was reduced from an average 30–40/week to only <10/week during the 1st wave in the March-April period. The number of children on the LT list during the study period across all 3 centres was 74 in total with 17 (23%) super-urgent and 57(77%) electives, which was comparable to previous years.Overall, 65–80 paediatric LTs are performed annually across the UK’s 3 paediatric centres. From March-November 2020 there were 58(82%) elective and 13(18%) super urgent (acute liver failure & hepatoblastoma) paediatric LTs performed.Donor Brain Dead (DBD) and Donor Cardiac Dead (DCDC) LTs were 54(76%) and 3(4%), respectively. Living related LT (LRLT) programme was sustained comprising 20% of LTs performed.The number of paediatric LTs performed during the pandemic was comparable to those performed yearly since 2016. The number of LT per paediatric centre for King’s College Hospital (KCH), Birmingham Children’s Hospital (BCH) and Leeds Liver Unit were 40 (56%), 15(21%) and 16(23%), respectively with excellent outcome. A 15-year-old girl from KCH diagnosed with Wilson disease presented with liver failure and became COVID-19 positive whilst listed. She underwent LT soon after becoming COVID-19 negative. No perioperative mortality was reported with excellent outcome so far in all.ConclusionThe current COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the UK adult LT programme. The paediatric programme LT was preserved despite a decrease in organ offering and retrieval nationally plus limitations on adult intensive care resources at a regional level. Overall, paediatric LT outcome remained very good.

New dimensions for hospital services and early detection of disease: a Review from the Lancet Commission into liver disease in the UK.

This Review, in addressing the unacceptably high mortality of patients with liver disease admitted to acute hospitals, reinforces the need for integrated clinical services. The masterplan described is based on regional, geographically sited liver centres, each linked to four to six surrounding district general hospitals-a pattern of care similar to that successfully introduced for stroke services. The plan includes the establishment of a lead and deputy lead clinician in each acute hospital, preferably a hepatologist or gastroenterologist with a special interest in liver disease, who will have prime responsibility for organising the care of admitted patients with liver disease on a 24/7 basis. Essential for the plan is greater access to intensive care units and high-dependency units, in line with the reconfiguration of emergency care due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This Review strongly recommends full implementation of alcohol care teams in hospitals and improved working links with acute medical services. We also endorse recommendations from paediatric liver services to improve overall survival figures by diagnosing biliary atresia earlier based on stool colour charts and better caring for patients with impaired cognitive ability and developmental mental health problems. Pilot studies of earlier diagnosis have shown encouraging progress, with 5-6% of previously undiagnosed cases of severe fibrosis or cirrhosis identified through use of a portable FibroScan in primary care. Similar approaches to the detection of early asymptomatic disease are described in accounts from the devolved nations, and the potential of digital technology in improving the value of clinical consultation and screening programmes in primary care is highlighted. The striking contribution of comorbidities, particularly obesity and diabetes (with excess alcohol consumption known to be a major factor in obesity), to mortality in COVID-19 reinforces the need for fiscal and other long delayed regulatory measures to reduce the prevalence of obesity. These measures include the food sugar levy and the introduction of the minimum unit price policy to reduce alcohol consumption. Improving public health, this Review emphasises, will not only mitigate the severity of further waves of COVID-19, but is crucial to reducing the unacceptable burden from liver disease in the UK.

SARS-CoV-2 infection and early mortality of waitlisted and solid organ transplant recipients in England: A national cohort study.

Patients waitlisted for and recipients of solid organ transplants (SOT) are perceived to have a higher risk of contracting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and death; however, definitive epidemiological evidence is lacking. In a comprehensive national cohort study enabled by linkage of the UK transplant registry and Public Health England and NHS Digital Tracing services, we examined the incidence of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and subsequent mortality in patients on the active waiting list for a deceased donor SOT and recipients with a functioning SOT as of February 1, 2020 with follow-up to May 20, 2020. Univariate and multivariable techniques were used to compare differences between groups and to control for case-mix. One hundred ninety-seven (3.8%) of the 5184 waitlisted patients and 597 (1.3%) of the 46 789 SOT recipients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Mortality after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 was 10.2% (20/197) for waitlisted patients and 25.8% (154/597) for SOT recipients. Increasing recipient age was the only variable independently associated with death after positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Of the 1004 transplants performed in 2020, 41 (4.1%) recipients have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with 8 (0.8%) deaths reported by May 20. These data provide evidence to support decisions on the risks and benefits of SOT during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.